You can avoid Newton's Rings by placing the film emulsion side down and using a spacer (or sticker) on the shiny, upper side. You will need a glass carrier to get corner-to-corner sharpness. There is no advantage, IMO, to scan B&W negatives as positives then invert in Photoshop, as often helps with a flatbed scanner. Nikonscan and Silverfast both have an useful 16-bit B&W negative mode. Solution and do not have stringent deadlines to meet. Pass scanning with the idea that I am after a reasonable time vs quality I would welcome your suggestions on the choice of software, multipass or long To be a solution which takes in most of the film positives like the latitudeĪnd tonality together with a more film like appearance of the images (which Well as Noise Ninja and my film choice is progressively converging versusĬolour negative film, and maybe Tri X or HP5, as I have found that it tends I have Vuescan, Silverfast and Nikon scan, as Now, the tricky part is that I am again in front of an uphill task ofĭiscovering the best workflow for using this scanner in a way which could do Is, that if you do not go beyond 5 times enlargement,the Nikon is an overkill. Samples for the benefit of those that still have to decide. Who has no commercial interest of any kind, I am willing to supply some If anybody is interested to see theĭifference between the epson V750 and Nikon CS 9000 scans done by an amateur When enlarging beyond 5 or 6 times factor. Quality is indeed noticeably better, however it becomes apparent prevalently I've only made a couple of scans so far, and I can already see that the ![]() Without the crop factor issues, was to get a better scanner, and therefore The MTF of my chain and would also enable me to use all my 11 hassy lenses ![]() Meantime, I have concluded that my cheapest quality upgrade, that would raise This sum on a low pixel density, large sensor full frame DSLR body like theĬanon 5D (except that I am waiting for a Nikon), and wait in the wings for anĪcceptable (for me) price on a larger sensor area MFDB like the P25. Resolution and MTF's I have concluded, that instead of taking a 16MP 37x37ĭigital back for 10.000$ It would make much more sense to spend a quarter of However, after going through some informed articles about the image quality, Into an angry spell and started thinking about the CFV digital back purchase. To mention the amount of time I lost scanning and spotting them, so I went Of my Fuji S3, but these TMY scans were decisively below my expectations, not V750, and the results on 13X19 prints were competitive with the digital output I have been scanning so far the transparencies and colour negatives on Epson I have been through some heavy thinking lately, after I got several rolls of
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |